Neoseeker : Blogs : ZL : The Dark Knight Review (May Contain Spoilers)

ZL's Blog

The Dark Knight Review (May Contain Spoilers)



We were all anticipating this movie since the minute we saw Gordon hand out a Joker card to our Dark Knight. Mostly all of us got online and started gossiping about the release of this movie as soon as we left the theaters from watching Batman Begins. It was a great movie and we couldn't wait to see what Nolan had in store for the next sequel. Well, finally my friends, that time has come.



We all shit our pants on July 18th, 2008. We couldn't believe it! Another masterpiece! It was 100 times better than The Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, and any other masterpiece put together (except Titanic, that wasn't a masterpiece just some soap in movie form). And like last time, we all got on the internet and bragged about how we saw it on it's opening day and we started talking about the sequel. Would they replace the Joker? Would Catwoman be introduced? What about Robin? Will Johnny Depp play the Riddler? Is Nolan even thinking about a sequel? Argh!

I mean, is he really thinking about a sequel? He already has this amazing masterpiece right? Wrong. As much as I love this movie, it's not quite the masterpiece we all thought it was. Better than it's predecessor, but if we didn't have the amazing hype we had before it's Theatrical Release, we would have noticed a lot of things wrong with this movie.

If you're like me and you need to have this movie as soon as possible then you're probably one of those people that decided to download one of the leaked versions of the movie. I'm sure some of you got the DVD version and are bragging about it at the moment, but really, that release sucks. The quality is horrible and probably doesn't even work on a DVD player, that's why I went with something bigger. The HD versions were leaked about a week ago and I got my hands on one of them. So yes, I'm bragging about me getting The Dark Knight in glorious HD. Suck on that bitches.

Whether you got this illegally or not (impossible, it's not Dec. 9 yet) you'll notice that this movie is ridiculously long. It is really long though? Of course not, it runs for about 145 minutes (that's 2 hours and 25 minutes for some of you) and it's nothing compared to great movies like Pulp Fiction or The Godfather, but why does this movie feel so ridiculously long? I can't honestly answer that though, but I'm thinking it's because there's a lot of *bleep*ing talking. Seriously, I thought that what prequels were for.

But to go around this unnoticed, Nolan used his secret weapon, The Joker. But even this amazing masterpiece has it's own flaws. The main one being that the great actor died. So there goes the secret weapon for the possible sequel to this. Let's not go there for now, let's explore this movie a little.



Unlike most Superhero sequels this one is different. It doesn't start off all boring recapping what happened in the last movie. I mean, who wants to see that shit? If the movie deserves a sequel, chances are it's that great and everyone remembers it the first one. And who else would be dumb enough to watch the sequel without watching its predecessor? So Nolan knowing this he skipped all that boring stuff and brought us pure action at the beginning to hook us under his masterpiece spell.

We see a bank robbery and in minutes we see the evil villain doing his work. This guy is crazy, he's immoral, violent. We love it. It's what any comic crazed person could dream of, a real life version of the Joker. This bastard cares nothing in this world but pure chaos.

After that, we get boring scenes here and there. The only thing that makes up for it are the Joker's amazing screen time. Which is weird, because we get good scenes here, and then we get boring scenes, then we get action again, and we're back to boring. Is this movie teasing us? I thought I already had a girlfriend for that.

But what's worse of this movie is this character here. Try to guess who it is.



No, that's not ET. That's Rachel Dawes played by Maggie Gyllenhaal. Seriously, I don't know what happened, did they run out of makeup each day when they put it all over Ledger's face? They must have had some left overs. Seriously. In theaters I saw nothing wrong with her face, maybe it was because I'm blind and can't see too much details from far away or maybe my expectations were met and I was blinded on those scenes. Who knows, but when you finally get this thing for you to pause and zoom in on your own, you find out that this video was telling the truth. Thank god they kill her off in the end (Oops I gave the plot twist away).

Eventually into the amazingness of the movie you finally get to the part where they capture the Joker (Damn!). Don't worry, he gets away but here's the interesting part. They try to identify him. They tried to match finger prints, probably took some of his hair for DNA matches, everything. They even check his clothes for logos to see if they can find out where he bought them and interrogate those sellers. They do all that, but they don't think about taking his make-up off? Seriously, in the comics you can't do that because his face is literally white, doesn't matter how he got that, but it's not *bleep*ing make-up. In the movie version though, you get people saying how he wears make-up and what not to scare people of just because he's crazy. They even give you a scene and a slight shot of him not wearing make up!



Something tells me Gordan should have never became the Commissioner and therefore gives us another plot hole. I think I would have been a better Commissioner.



Let's try to ignore that small mistake though. As I mentioned earlier, the problem with this movie is that it's really long and the only reason it's like that is because of how slow pacing it is. Everyone is talking trying to explain what's going on like if we can't put the puzzle together, in the end you realize this movie is literally two in one. First you have the Joker terrorizing everyone to scare them, to make them go crazy, just for the hell of it. Then at the same time you have Harvey Dent trying to be the White Knight of Gotham. So, the Joker first tries to kill Harvey Dent, but after failing he decides to do something much more. This is where it brings us to part two of the movie, turning Gotham's White Knight to something evil like the Joker.

Knowing this, you should be aware that the first half is action packed, while the second half isn't quite there. It does have some good scenes like the Hospital explosion and such, but it's nothing compared to the first half like the chasing scene. What's worse is that Harvey's second half didn't have enough time to develop. This freak just goes on a killing spree over the death of his supposed girlfriend. Talk about being pussy whooped. Bruce Wayne didn't have that problem, so what's up with Dent?

Unfortunately Nolan had some mental problems after the death of Ledger and he didn't know what to do with Two-Face. He couldn't compare to the Joker and he knew he was too pussy whooped to promise a sequel. He did what any emo boy would have done when his beloved girlfriend broke up with him, he killed him.



I'd love to go on about how The Dark Knight's flaws, but I don't want to ruin this great masterpiece for you. Maybe while you watch this movie you'll be able to find out why Nolan decided to kill half of his cast on-screen or off-screen, doesn't matter (Surprised Batman didn't die). Even though this movie has its slight flaws you gotta admit that it had you at the edge of your seat even though the characters talked a lot. The Joker is enough for you to watch this movie, and what's best is that you don't even have to watch Batman Begins to understand this movie.

That being said, I give this movie an 9 out of 10. Better than it's predecessor, but not quite there.

Comments

  • 1 thumbs!
    tekmosis since Jul 2006 | Nov 29, 08
    Cool review. Personally, I enjoyed Batman Begins more so than Dark Knight. While I found The Joker to be a far superior villain than any of villains in Batman Begins, the movie fell short on plot in some areas.

    I thought that the next movie would revolve around Two Face in some shape or form like Batman Forever (Two Face / The Riddler) but as you know that is not the case. I felt that as Two Face, his screen time was way too short. They also over did it with the CG on his face, far more than what was in the comics and Batman Forever.
    • 0 thumbs!
      ZL since Jun 2004 | Nov 30, 08
      I agree. Two-Face has always been my favorite Batman Villain and to see him on film for a short time and then killed put me down a lot. To me, Two-Face felt like a Joker to me. I mean, he just went mad and crazy. The Two-Face in the comics or in the cartoons had a split personality. This one didn't.

      While I was watching the movie I thought that Two-Face would be the next villain on Nolan's next project. I guess not.
      • 0 thumbs!
        tekmosis since Jul 2006 | Nov 30, 08
        In comparison to the Two Face that Tommy Lee played, this character was rather lacking (not just on screen time). While, I was a bit disappointed I do believe Nolan's intention was to simply have him as a little tid bit to add flavor to the movie, nothing to gain a spot light on.

        I do however look forward to the next movie and how Nolan will portray the characters. As amusing as Jim Carrey can be I found his portrayal of The Riddler to be a bit too....fruity, where as Nolan's direction is more dark.
        • 0 thumbs!
          Storm since Jul 2005 | Dec 9, 08
          I kind of don't want Riddler in the sequel, would rather have someone that can really fight Batman. Joker, Scarecrow, Riddler, and Two-Face don't have much fighting expertise. I don't know why, I guess I'd just like someone to take Batman on physically this time around. Ghul also didn't put up much of a fight.

          Great review, I agree with Maggie's role and also would have liked to see more Two-Face. He was developed a decent amount for what little time they put him up, but I feel it can be more fleshed out if he cand get into the sequel...but wait, is Two-Face dead?

          As ZL mentioned, Two-Face felt like Joker here, and I'm sure if they bring in Riddler, he may as well be the same way.
          Last edited by Storm :: Dec 9, 08
  • 0 thumbs!
    Linkin Park Fan since Jul 2005 | Dec 5, 08
    Hmm, How did I not catch the part about the make up?

    I also didn't like how they barely showed two-face, and I didn't like Maggie Gyllenhaal at all in this movie.
  • 0 thumbs!
    legend of ur face since Dec 2006 | Dec 10, 08
    I was prtty pissy when they killed Two-Face to be honest.:/
    They barely introduced him in and what do you know? He *bleep*ing dies. I wish Two-Face had more time on screen, he's always been one of my favorites.8D
    Tbh, I thought that Batman's love interest would be some hot chick..but whatever.
    Nice review.
  • 0 thumbs!
    Futility since Dec 2008 | Dec 15, 08
    I liked the film but I don't like the fact that they replaced Katy Holmes with some other actress.

    I also think that in the film there are actual hints to sequal villians. Such as when Batman is walking through the prision the camera focuses on two doors. One with a man, supsiciously looking like a penguin, and a really skinny guy I think might be the Riddler.
    Last edited by Futility :: Dec 15, 08
    • 0 thumbs!
      Bleeding Rose since Feb 2009 | Mar 18, 09
      Also, when Batman asks Lucius about how his batsuit will do against dogs, Lucius replies with "Well, it will hold up against cats." This hints at Catwoman.
  • 0 thumbs!
    coolkhush since Jan 2009 | Jan 1, 09
    the movie has done really well and has been stated the bestseller of the year its a must watch ......
  • 0 thumbs!
    coolkhush since Jan 2009 | Jan 14, 09
    the movie was undoubdtely awsome but im waiting for the dvd release can u tell me wen is it ??
  • 0 thumbs!
    | Jan 20, 09
    the date for the dvd release is closing in and so is my excitement ....
  • 0 thumbs!
    | Jan 20, 09
    yes even im waiting for the release do u have any idea wen is the release i wanna know ???
  • 0 thumbs!
    Stem Cell since Aug 2004 | Apr 15, 09
    I thought the movie was awesome. The Joker played by Heith Ledger was teriffic. I like how he wasn't like Jack Nickolson, his joker was more funny, cooky... Heath's joker was dark, violent, had a lack of human emotion. It was good for the movie. Nolan has done a great job remaking the batman series. Two-face was also a good addition to the film. RACHEL!! Everytime he screamed I jumped a bit, it's loud and surprising. hah
Add your comment:
Name *:  Members, please LOGIN before posting
Email:
Live user
verification *:

Enter the letters you see in the image (without spaces)
Comment *:

ZL

RSS Feed for ZL
Houston, TX, United States
Neoseeker Profile forum posts Send ZL an email Send ZL a PM Sign guest book Gallery
Add as Neofriend
Post Information
Friends' Updates
Favourite Blogs Updates
Favourite Blogs List
Klope62
Latest Gallery Images
Sophmore T-Shirt Design
Senior T-Shirt Design
(0.1038/d/aeon)