Gamerdude97 blogged
Jul 19, 17 5:15pm

So here it is. The first time I'm nearing the end of something without knowing the continuation. I'm about to be unemployed. Got my last paycheck earlier in July. It feels weird. I still don't know what my next job will be. I do not fear my future though. I've racked up good savings and I'm in good hands. However, I need to find out what I want to work with and I gotta figure that shit out real soon. August 1st I'm not longer considered a working citizen...and it feels real weird.
Agent Aitch blogged
Jul 19, 17 12:33pm

I'm going to be posting my pictures in a special album in my gallery called "Zoo Trip". Each one will be labeled to the best of my ability and memory. :)
They were all taken with my 3DS camera, so they might seem lower quality than they could be.
EpicRaptorMan blogged
Jul 19, 17 2:00am

A large Tyrannosaurus could exceed 12 meters in length, possess 60 banana-sized teeth, and weigh up to 9 tons! But perhaps the most famous dinosaur of all time had one comedic flaw...tiny arms.

It didn't take long for people to deem the tyrant's arms as vestigial. And while it is true that their arms are proportionally small when compared to their body size and their exact purpose is unknown, but they certainly are not weak.
A Tyrannosaurus' arm is about three feet long and according to bone size and muscle attachments... "The bicep alone -- and this is a conservative estimate -- could curl 430 pounds," according to Jack Conrad, a vertebrate paleontologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Humans on the other hand are only known to max out at about 260 lbs.
But at the end of the day, despite their sheer strength, the T. rex's arms weren't very flexible -- movements like twisting and rotating was impossible. "The T. rex probably couldn't have done the arm-wrestling move," Conrad says. "So maybe you could get him on a technicality."
Agent Aitch blogged
Jul 17, 17 5:26pm

While I have not yet received any calls back from any of my prospective employers, and I can only think of one more place to apply in my town, I am in for a fun-filled day tomorrow! We're planning to go to the zoo in Asheboro, North Carolina, the largest natural habitat zoo in the world.
First, we have a four-hour drive, and my brother and I just bought some CDs, mine country, his tropical, so we'll be listening to them on the way.
I'll try to post some pictures afterward, maybe Wednesday or Thursday!
EpicRaptorMan blogged
Jul 15, 17 9:12pm

Okay, "King Kong" might be bit of an exaggeration but nonetheless its name means "giant ape" in Greek. Gigantopithecus existed roughly 9 million years ago to as early as 100,000 years ago in what is now China, India, and Vietnam...that means Gigantopithecus could have coexisted with some hominin species!
Fossils imply that G. blacki was the largest ape to ever live -- standing almost 10 feet from the ground and weighing around 2,000 pounds (roughly 3-4x that of a gorilla and 7x heavier than the orangutan; its closest relative). Thanks to its immense size, Gigantopithecus probably had few predators once fully grown although tigers, pythons, crocodiles, hyenas, bears, saber-toothed cats, and even Homo erectus would've been threats for young, old and injured Gigantopithecus.

This ape's locomotion is currently uncertain due to lack of fossil evidence. Majority of scientists think that Gigantopithecus was a quadruped (like modern gorillas and chimpanzees) to better support the animal's massive weight while the minority suggests that Gigantopithecus was bipedal.
In life, Gigantopithecus probably inhabited the bamboo forests of Asia and fed on seeds, fruits, and bamboo.
EpicRaptorMan blogged
Jul 13, 17 4:33am

In the 2001 film Jurassic Park III there was a short fight between these two dinosaurs where the Spinosaurus emerges as the victor by snapping the tyrannosaurs' neck.
There has been alot of debate about who would really win in this fight. And well, you won't like the answer I'll give you... Neither.

Spinosaurus lived in the early to late Cretaceous period (approximately 112 - 93mya) in what is now known as north Africa. While Tyrannosaurus lived 65mya in North America, that's at least a twenty-eight million year gap! So simply put, these animals would never meet.
But for the sake of the arguement if, hypothetically, these two theropod dinosaurs did live at the same time and same place then they still were not likely to ever cross paths. Tyrannosaurus was a terrestrial based theropod while Spinosaurus was semi-aquatic. Tyrannosaurus' diet would have primarily contained other dinosaurs such as hadrosaurs, ceratopsians, and even ankylosaurs. Meanwhile, Spinosaurus was a piscivore and would've fed on various species of lungfish, giant coelacanths, and huge sawfish like Onchopristis. Simply put: the two dinosaurs would not be in competiton with one another.
However, during times of drought, when the rivers dried up Spinosaurus might would need to adjust its diet in order to survive... While currently there is no solid fossil evidence that supports Spinosaurus hunting terrestrial animals there is some evidence elsewhere... Another, earlier spinosaurid known as Baryonyx was discovered with Iguanodon (a dinosaur) bones in its stomach region -- but this could easily have been scavenging rather than hunting. In South America a pterosaur (a flying reptile) bone was uncovered with a spinosaurid tooth stuck into it.

So even after all of that, if these two dinosaurs were to meet they probably wouldn't even fight. Both of these animals are quite large and engaging in an actual fight could prove fatal for both as the smallest infection could seal their fate. Usually, modern day carnivores will try to avoid conflicts with others by retreating. Playing safe is always smarter than playing reckless.

If you're not satisfied with that answer than I don't know what to tell you. Both of these dinosaurs are forever extinct and a fight between them would be mere speculation as a real-life fight simply has too many factors in deciding the winner.
walnuts blogged
Jul 12, 17 7:40pm

Been a while since I've been around these parts, but just felt like jotting down a few things about life and the universe - put my thoughts on to paper, so to speak.

Been thinking about updating my PC lately - about 5 years old now and, whilst I've updated some parts that have failed (graphics card and PSU come to mind) I think I need to bite the bullet and go for the jugular and update the CPU and motherboard with it. Currently running an AMD 1100T which has given good service, but I would like to go for something beastly. In addition to the CPU, I'd LOVE to add a M.2 SSD to my system - sadly, that's big dollars at the moment haha.

I'm sorted to go and see 'The Beguiled' sometime next week with the family (trailer below) - it looks like an awesome thriller, and with an all-star cast (Kidman, Dunst and Farrell) headlining it, it should be one film full of twists and traps along the way. Can't wait!

Of course, my main picture that I am hanging out for is Dunkirk (trailer below) - I'm a bit of a WWII buff, and combine the 'Miracle of Dunkirk' with the masterful storytelling of Nolan, and it's sure to be a winner :rainbow:

Song of the day
Fortunate Son - Creedence Clearwater Revival
colinkenn blogged
Jul 11, 17 12:05pm

Do you know this feeling when you finally found what you would like to do, and then somebody pours cold water on your aspirations using valid arguments? You may get such experience if you decide to become an indie game developer and create games alone or with a small team. There is too much competition in a video games market. How would you present your creation among 4207 games that were released on Steam In 2016? There are success stories; however, it looks like they are exceptions that prove the rule.

Since I want to engage in creating games, I have decided to have a look at the industry from the perspective of a gamer. What would make me buy an indie game?

Interesting description

Almost nobody likes spoilers, but still, people like to know what they are paying for beforehand. Some details will not be superfluous but intriguing. For instance, I am much more inclined to buy a game, when I see what new features it provides. For example, Remothered: Tormented Father would seem another unremarkable survival horror if there were no mentioning about a fanatic cult of cloistered nuns in red, not present in beta, as well as about new mechanics (your enemies never give up or die, the soundtrack alerts you when they are getting closer, etc.) I mean, the way you present your game is also important.
Obviously, I would not like empty promises that would significantly change my attitude to a studio and for the better as it was with No Man’s Sky.

Reasonable comparison with AAA titles

I do not like when developers compare their games with more famous ones and say that their creations are better. It sounds too presumptuous and abstractly. As a player, I would like to know, what the difference between the games is, and what new features I can get. Have you created something like Dark Souls, but better? The comparison makes no sense until there is an explanation that it is something like DS, but MMO.

No sky-high technical requirements

I appreciate the possibility to feed my eyes with modern colorful graphics, but I cannot afford myself to buy another laptop for gaming. My MacBook Air is not designed for playing high spec video games, but that does not mean I am destined to work and watch videos only. I would buy a well-balanced indie game that I can download and play immediately without using Mac maintenance software or Game Boosters. Besides, I do not think that hand drawn indie graphics are worse. Pixel art is also not necessarily a sign of a game made by lazy developers, although it can be sometimes. An interesting game plot along with stylish artistic work can beat any expensive game with realistic 3D models in my eyes.

The game has to be either unique or universal

There are players that prefer AAA titles and there are players who like games “with a soul”. I remember how glad they were when Child of Light came out. The latter, including me, appreciate unique experience they cannot get anywhere else.

For instance, Paradox Interactive decided to take a chance and did not passed it up. This company creates games many players feel squeamish about. However, they found their audience, which was eager to find just that kind of games like Magicka, Europa Universalis and War of Roses.

There are also indie games that do not have homogeneous audience, but still provide gaming experience that AAA games lack. That’s one more type of games that I would be interested in as well. By the way, Minecraft is a very good example of a game with simplistic graphics that became popular thanks to giving players various tints of emotions and providing them with experience that was not available before. There were times when Minecraft had more Twitter followers than Kotaku.

The last but not least: turning again to Minecraft, I think Markus Persson unintentionally gave players an opportunity to become creators and that worked. As a player, I appreciate it, like millions of others do. I also suppose, it is possible to analyze players’ needs and foresee what can become the next big thing.
EpicRaptorMan blogged
Jul 11, 17 2:55am

Phorusrhacids, or better known as, Terror Birds were apex predators of the South American continent throughout the Cenozoic era from shortly after the K-T extinction up to their disappearance more recently (roughly 2,000,000 years ago).
These birds came in various shapes and sizes usually reaching 1-3 meters (3.3 - 9.8 feet) tall. Terror birds were known from South America, but once the Isthmus of Panama emerged from the oceans it created a land bridge connecting the two American continents. Soon after that the event known as the Great American Interchange went underway. As wolves, cats, and bears invaded South America one terror bird in particular traveled northward; Titanis walleri. Besides this it is possible that phorusrhacids also lived in Africa and Europe, but this is still questioned.

Terror birds could not fly, but instead they hunted in the open plains and could rely on chasing down their prey by running at speeds of around 30mph. Aside from being swift terror birds also had large heads, sharp curved beaks, strong necks, long legs, and deadly talons. Although there seems to be one flaw -- due to proportions terror birds had relatively weak bites... Instead, it is possible that for larger animals the birds could use their legs to deliver powerful blows; stunning the animals. Then, using their feet and talons the bird can pin the wounded animal to the ground. Lastly, using the powerful neck the bird would forcefully peck the prey to death.
As for smaller prey, phorusrhacids could simply crush them using their mighty feet and talons or viciously pick up the critter in its beak and slam it to the ground before swallowing it whole.

(Kelenken guillermoi lived in what is now known as Patagonia during the Miocene epoch; 15 million years ago. It was discovered in 2006 and is currently the terror bird with the largest skull. Kelenken's skull is near perfectly preserved and was 28 inches long with the beak alone being roughly 18 inches long!)

Today, Terror Birds no longer exist. The reason for this is often blamed on the Great American Interchange where the new predators from North America simply caused too much direct competition for the birds. Humans are also often blamed, but the last phorusrhacids vanished from the fossil record at least a million years before the first humans.
Agent Aitch blogged
Jul 10, 17 11:11am

OK, so maybe I exaggerated a little... I just submitted an online application at Taco Bell. I talked to my ex-boss, who is more-or-less a friend of mine, over the week-end when I got a Quesarito, and she promised it wouldn't be bad. I have some psychological problems, so even though I hated it so much a few months ago, for some reason I believed her and I knew I had to apply.
Please pray for me... I need to get mental help, but I dont know how to do that without my family finding out.
Agent Aitch blogged
Jul 8, 17 6:07pm

I still can't find a job, except... Taco Bell. It seems like my family is pressuring me to go back there, but they don't know how much it hurts.
Either way, I can't stay unemployed forever. I can't ever possibly explain to them how I feel.
I'll probably submit an application this week. I'm really depressed and confused and lost right now. I don't know what to do.
Heh92 blogged
Jul 7, 17 6:29am

Hey guys, before you decide not to do business with me based on my 1 (negative) review, please read my response to that review. Being a new member on neoseeker and also new to the trading/buying/selling scene, I'd really like to build up my reputation and prove that I'm an honest buyer. I'll ALWAYS offer to either go first or pay for a verified Neoseeker MM like Reefbooty or AxnkooL. Thanks! :)
EpicRaptorMan blogged
Jul 6, 17 1:04am

Sauropods such as Apatosaurus and Brachiosaurus were once believed to be aquatic/semi-aquatic animals. Some sauropods, such as Argentinosaurus, could reach close to 100 tons in weight. The sheer size of these types of animals led scientists in the 19th - early 20th century to believe that sauropods were simply too large to have their bodies support the weight on land. Most restorations depicted sauropods being fully or partially submerged in water. This image was questioned in the beginning of the 1950s, however, these were flawed studies that ignored evidence that the bodies of sauropods were heavily saturated with air sacs...
In the 1970s more research was done that combined the sauropod's air sacs and an aquatic lifestyle went underway. Paleontologists added evidence from sedimentology and biomechanics to show that sauropods were primarily terrestrial animals. In 2004, it was noted that due to the extensive system of air sacs, sauropods were buoyant and unable to completely submerge themselves under water. Sauropods could float.

In favor of swimming sauropods, trackways have been discovered preserving only the forefeet (manus) prints. These tracks could be explained by macronarian sauropods who have longer forelimbs that were used to walk through the shallower waters, while their shorter hind limbs floated behind. Nevertheless, due to body proportions, floating sauropods would have been very unstable while immersed in water for long periods of time. Sauropods may not have been aquatic, but footprints located near coastlines and in floodplains suggest that these animals did prefer wet habitats at least some of the time.
EpicRaptorMan blogged
Jul 4, 17 2:32am

Canis dirus ("fearsome dog")
These ancient wolves are actually quite famous North American predators. The dire wolf is also the most commonly preserved animals in the La Brea Tar Pits located in Los Angeles with hundreds and hundreds of fossilized individuals.
The dire wolf coexisted with the Canis lupus (gray wolf) for around 100,000 years! However, the dire was larger and more robust than the gray, thus suggesting that the dire focused on larger and more powerful prey such as horses and bison. The dire wolf is also considered to be a pack hunter, but the large amount of fossil evidence implies that the dire wolves formed even larger packs than their gray counterparts (which usual consist of less than 10 members).
Dire wolves also had strong family bonds. These animals have been known to suffer from significant injuries such as crushed skulls and completely broken forelegs. Fortunately these injuries often wind up healing. This means that if a member of the pack is hurt then the rest of the pack would chip in and aid their fallen.

Why did the dire wolf go extinct? Well there is simply too many factors that decide extinction. Whatever the case scientists do know that the disappearance of larger prey items, which they specialized in hunting, did contribute to the dire's long rein. While their smaller counterparts, the gray wolves, continued to thrive as they regularly fed on smaller prey.
Latest Comments
Top Blogs